Thursday, March 7, 2019
Prison Food Essay
According to Faulkner (136-137), the use up for correctional institutions to rehabilitate offenders has been highlighted by the increase cost of exercises as well as recidivism statistics indicating that majority of offenders step to the fore in crimes committed and the lack of social participation or integration released offers are able to attain upon release (Hepburn & Griffin, 57-59). This perspective suggests that reformation is united to offenders productive and social potential.At the same time, Holmes (9) believes that the relationships and competencies developed by the offender during incarceration can serve as foundation for social reintegration and long-term rehabilitation. Thus many correctional facilities much(prenominal) as the northeastern punitory Center, have undertaken course of studymes that are designed to better equip offenders upon their release by engaging them in the institutions kitchen crew (Terris). Their objective is not yet educating inpatient s in the food trade industry for possible employment but too to reinforce social bonds and self-development (Hepburn & Griffin, 63-66).Background Terris points out that the programs is neither novel nor uncomparable to the Northeastern punitory Center. However, unlike general kitchen duties, inmates mentored in the institutions Fife and Drum restaurant based on methods from the Culinary Institute of the States by its head chef Eddie Jacobs. When the program started in 1983, the objective was to educate participants in the preparation of economical meals but since then has evolved into popular and even hunky-dory dining cuisine.Furthermore, according to the programs managers, participation in the program provides participants practical and commercial skills that have stable demand and daily applications. The program has had achieved success both from the perspective of prison administrators and inmates. According to the former, the programs do not only engage significantly the in terest of participating inmates but has excessively been enhancing the responsiveness and participation of non-participating inmates in existing programs.Terris likewise relates insights from participating inmate Idris Forde Forde believes that his in working in the Fife according to real world scenarios reinforces the protect of work as well as their role in the operation of an enterprise and in turn, their ability to become productive and benefits not only the Northeastern Correctional Center but in like manner all different stakeholders of the institution. Evaluation According to Currie (185-187), studies of repeat offenders, return to criminal behavior is in return related to the take aim of social integration and productivity upon reentry to society.Thus, establishment of programs enhancing inmates competency, productivity and social participation have the potential of decreasing the risks of recidivism. This opinion is also protrudeed by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Their inquiry indicated that the use of social reinforcement, whether in the form of social exclusion, direct support or mentoring and competencies or skills development, decreases susceptibility to criminal behavior by change magnitude the personal and social risks of re-incarceration.There is no doubt that there has been great realization of the role of correctional facilities in rehabilitation, which in contemporary perspectives implies prospered reintegration and limiting recidivism. However, it should also be noted that undertaking such(prenominal) a program has also significant challenges. In the case of the Northeastern Correctional Center, their relatively small population and their prison classification, allow for better margins for such programs. In the case of high-risk facilities which may be in lockdown that for a few hours a day, implementing the program is unlikely.Furthermore, the availability of instructors or mentors for the programs is also a consider ation. Moreover, prison programs and objectives have to be evaluated if they are consistent with such perspectives. Otherwise, such penal reforms can not be effectively employ or implemented as an operational directive for correctional institutions. Recommendations iodine of the first trade union movements to establish the significance of the success of the Fife program is to compare its level of success to similar programs in other correctional or rehabilitation facilities.A range to determine the degree of effectiveness has to also be established to map the competency or effectiveness of the programs. The next task is to identify the common components or strategies of the best programs which can then be utilized to compose requirements for programs that are to be developed. Regardless of the content, there should be sensitivity towards the constraints of implementation based on prison population, modality of offenses and psychiatrical evaluation.Ironically, there should also be realization that despite the level of introduce or statistical relevance of programs outlines or requirements, there is still a need for frequent sensitivity analyses to accommodate the variety of stakeholders and degree earthly concern concern afforded such initiatives. In conclusion, despite the level of success that the Northeastern Correctional Center has achieved in its kitchen program, there is still a need to evaluate its long term effectiveness and level application ability to determine the critical components for wider application and implementation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment