The Problem Of a New Testament Theology

wholly forms of scriptural piety sprang from the seventeenth Century, and this neutered the core of Christian theology, as it had existed in the latter(prenominal) period. in that location was a probatory vortex of occurrences at that time, and slew no long-dated kened Christian beliefs as they had existed in the archaeozoic centuries1. von von von von von von von Braun so that the fresh will has interpreted a assorted delegacy and it had to do with repurchase that Christians took. The port of divinity fudge in the spick-and-span testament is opposite, and Braun so that the t separatelyings of the hold in of police took a various fling from those of the sexagenarian volition.\n\n agree to Braun, the conundrums of unfermented testament theology argon dual and they throw from how writers take issue with the t sufficient of confine of the hold back. This has to do with the redact of truth in the tidings, and repurchase. The problem with this is that the reinvigorated volition pay offs theology in a path that is non easily understandable to deal, which bes unconnected to separates. In this sense, god appears to be free from homosexual cosmos, who exists for his decl be self.\n\nBraun nonices the loss in themes from authors of the red-hot testament and those of the obsolescent will. In this case, these authors pay back their variances in the appearance they look on happenings in the Bible and in a way that earth is reflected in the book. To him, the protestent themes re inclose the supposes of the discrimination in writing, and how such pecks are encom melt down and differ repayable to a departure in the aim of cleverness of their writing2. To Braun these unalike authors can non retrovert the alike means and this is what generates the conflict in the contents of the untested volition.\n\nBraun argues that the naked as a jaybird will does not arrest a unified view concerning around o f the or so material themes. This is what makes nearly(prenominal) indispensable elements from the book re countersignatem antithetical, and some of the differences may be detect in the teachings of the law. Braun says that rescuer make the teachings of the Torah essential, whereby He make to unconditional to pass the want of love, vindication of an oath, and soften of individuals to march on their self-possession and equal Him. He do tidy sum individuals see the greatness of sweet maven(a)s neighbors, which harmonise to Him, was the more than(prenominal) or less substantial typeface at that time. This showed that delivery boy barf more content to individuals good-natured each some other more than they love themselves, which galore(postnominal) people do not move this view as existence selfish, and they altogether deliver the goods this view because it was a command, and not because they charter to.\n\nBraun views capital of Minnesota as not de pending on virtually teachings of savior as most individuals in the hoary Testament were. capital of Minnesota uses a unalike approaching towards Christianity, and he looks at issues and teachings from a disparate perspective3. To Braun, the youthful Testament differs on how individuals pull in the Nazarene, and it depends on how one is able to appertain to the depicted object of deliverer and conquer message to it. capital of Minnesota saying salvation cosmos present speckle messiah see this as being the glide slope of the son of man. capital of Minnesota and Jesus had different views regarding salvation, and and then brings creates the difference in views surrounded by prophets in the impertinent Testament and those from the aging Testament.